Updates

blockchain

Why NuBits peg dropped and how it got fixed

1) What happened in May and June:


Just after the large NuBit sale by a single holder on May 27th, the peg was immediately lowered to 0.95. That is the cause of the failure of the liquidity engine. Period.

Then NuShareholders and the Liquidity team focused on:

- Focus on nsr buy back which lead to fund depletion  and complete halt of funds in tier 4, 5 and 6.
The result was: US-NBT went straight from $1.00 to under $0.20 while NSR went from 500 satoshis to 70 satoshis. 

Between June 2016 and September 2016, about 700 million NSR were spent repairing the damage from the reckless and unauthorized "experiment" 

 

We dont know where the attack came from --
It could have come from a nushareholder

 

2) What we have learned:

Directing liquidity operations effectively and efficiently requires expertise very few have. 
Liquidity operation needs to be centralized for now and decentralizing liquidity operations again is a long way down the priority list.
BUT the decentralized nature of the NuBits network remains unchanged. None of the changes NuShareholders have instituted in liquidity operations requires a protocol change. The basic deal and mode of the network remains unchanged. Transaction processing, voting of all kinds and most importantly, the allocation of custodial grants remains completely decentralized and unchanged from how it worked in 2015.

We have a chief liquidity officer: Phonenix (probably the second name of Jordan Lee, the founder of NuBits) -- He raised $300,000 in the two and a half months he has been CLO

NuShareholder must prevent a loss of peg on nubits, because it will be reflected back immediately on nushare

To sum up, NuShareholders would like decentralized liquidity. However, reliable and cost effective liquidity is a much, much higher priority.


3) A lot of debate is going on about:
- whether we should have a business model
- to which extent we should back up US-NBT in reserve.

However Phonenix (not supporting any business model and any model) has earned the consensus by voting (64% of support)
His popularity is growing
Minting is picking up
He is getting paid for his role.


4) Asset price:

We have boosted the asset price without parking, without reserve
400% in 70 days


5) What we are doing now:

We have resumed the selling of US-NBT since the peg was abandoned in late May. When we sell US-NBT from liquidity operations, the funds become part of our reserve and are used to place US-NBT buy orders at $0.995. 

The US-NBT price on Poloniex has stayed within the $0.995 to $1.005 range for all of the last 24 hours. There are $5600 in buy orders at or above $0.995 and an impressive $39,000 in buy orders above $0.975. That is probably more than 13% of all the US-NBT in circulation.

6) The future:

Launching CN-NBT and EU-NBT 

≫ 続きを読む

blog   2016/10/07   gbboy

NuBits: achievements after 15 months of operation [part-2]

"- A healthy core mechanism that has been established

NuBits is NOT backed by fiat reserves but by the value of the issuing "bank" like corporation Nu.

NuBits (NBT) get sold by Nu for BTC and the BTC get invested in development (increasing the value of Nu), share (NuShares; NSR) buybacks and very little in marketing and other activities.

While sold NBT are only temporary revenue (the NBT in circulation are a liability for Nu), NBT get destroyed with transaction fees.
Destroyed NBT are final revenue for Nu.
Nu is still young and evolving, but the peg has been kept at exactly 1 USD.

The close peg is a direct result from the compensation that is paid to liquidity providers to put orders with a close spread on order books;

 

- NBT have all attributes good crypto currencies have:

* the blockchain is being run in a decentralized manner.
* NBT owners can have total control over their NBT by sending them to an address for which only they have the private key (an experimental web wallet is available, though).
* multi signature transactions are available to increase security and allow escrowed transactions.
* the source code is open, but compiled wallets for Windows, MacOS and Linux are available (as well as at least 2 apps for Android: Coinomi (btw. the Coinomi developer is one of Nu's core developers) and NuDroid).

 

- If there's need to adjust Nu, there's the incredibly powerful "motion" feature. 
This has been used for a lot of strategic decisions and can be used for anything that requires a consensus of those who have a stake in Nu. NSR holders (the owners of Nu) can decide what to do.
Nu is a corporation with business process on a blockchain - the same blockchain that processes NBT transactions.

 

- Meanwhile you can use NuBits for hedging crypto currency volatility.

 

- NuBits is in a unique position if the following attributes are important: 

* open source
* decentralized
* being pegged to fiat, but not depending on fiat (not holding fiat as collateral)
* stable!
 

- NuBits has successfully proven that it is possible to create a stable crypto-currency. Imagine that the design of Ethereum had been based on a stable coin (tracking say the dollar / euro) which would be used to pay for transactions and a separate share token that is used to stake out consensus.

 

- NuBits is secure:

* Nu is check-point free for over a year with no problem. 

* Relies on Peercoin Proof of Stake, to which the objections  are purely theoretical and bad theory at that. The only real argument against PoS comes down to whether you can trust humans to come to consensus about something over the long term (weak subjectivity). The fact that some governments (a long-term human consensus process) have existed for hundreds of years kinda flies in the face of the 8 years btc has existed for. Note that weak subjectivity is also used in bitcoin (btc core) and is revealing a lot of politics on the long term scale. Basically, the only flaws Peercoin or Nu have are the same flaws that bitcoin and in fact all governments and human consensus processes face."

 

 

≫ 続きを読む

release   2015/12/11   gbboy

Venture Capital with the Peershares template

We have the tools necessary to build an entire crypto-ecosystem on top of the Peershares platform in a similar fashion to other crypto 2.0 platforms.

We are envisioning each DAC with its own customized Peershares implementation.

Nu is particular because it will act as the central bank of the economy, albeit it goes without saying now decentralized and distributed and flattened out.

What is next? Hopefully an ever increasing supply of DAOs, each offering its own novel business model.

Also, sometimes funding can actually come from a pre-existing DAO. (BCEX was partially funded with Nu)

We are discovering a new type of venture capitalist here: the DAO.

 

≫ 続きを読む

blog   2015/09/03   gbboy